KIRhub 2.0
Sign inResearch Use Only

LRRK2 (I2020T)

Sign in to save this workspace

LRRK2 · Variant type: point · HGVS: p.I2020T

Drug response on this variant

#DrugInhibition on variantResidualKISS
1Ceritinib99.5%0.5%95.44
2Gilteritinib98.7%1.3%88.97
3Brigatinib97.7%2.3%82.96
4Alectinib96.9%3.1%95.49
5Sunitinib96.0%4.0%91.73
6Axitinib95.4%4.6%93.23
7Ponatinib92.4%7.6%78.23
8Defactinib85.8%14.2%92.68
9Osimertinib76.7%23.3%97.24
10Bosutinib74.9%25.1%87.22
11Vemurafenib74.1%25.9%96.49
12Ruxolitinib71.7%28.3%98.25
13Fostamatinib70.5%29.5%96.74
14Nintedanib70.0%30.0%90.23
15Pacritinib66.6%33.4%88.64
16Repotrectinib66.0%34.0%84.21
17Baricitinib61.1%38.9%97.99
18Abemaciclib61.1%38.9%91.48
19Upadacitinib60.0%40.0%97.98
20Lorlatinib58.0%42.0%97.24
21Fedratinib40.8%59.2%96.21
22Canertinib37.5%62.5%96.49
23Lenvatinib37.2%62.8%97.74
24Pralsetinib36.9%63.1%93.43
25Selpercatinib32.1%67.9%96.72

Wild-type vs variant — drug response delta

Positive Δ means the drug hits the variant harder than wild-type (mutation-selective); negative Δ means it loses potency (resistance).

DrugVariant inhWT inhΔ (variant − WT)
Ceritinib99.5%99.4%+0.0%
Gilteritinib98.7%97.2%+1.5%
Brigatinib97.7%96.6%+1.1%
Alectinib96.9%94.5%+2.3%
Sunitinib96.0%95.8%+0.3%
Axitinib95.4%92.3%+3.1%
Ponatinib92.4%63.4%+29.1%
Defactinib85.8%95.8%-9.9%
Osimertinib76.7%82.4%-5.7%
Bosutinib74.9%69.5%+5.4%
Vemurafenib74.1%
Ruxolitinib71.7%63.0%+8.8%
Fostamatinib70.5%69.3%+1.2%
Nintedanib70.0%67.2%+2.8%
Pacritinib66.6%83.4%-16.8%
Repotrectinib66.0%68.8%-2.8%
Baricitinib61.1%62.8%-1.6%
Abemaciclib61.1%79.1%-18.0%
Upadacitinib60.0%73.3%-13.3%
Lorlatinib58.0%
Fedratinib40.8%
Canertinib37.5%
Lenvatinib37.2%
Pralsetinib36.9%
Selpercatinib32.1%

Cancer associations

CancerOrganSource
carcinoma_breastBreastref
AML-USBlood/Lymphatic Systemref
UCECUterusref

Annotations

Sign in to read and post annotations.

Loading…

Served from saifudeen2026@1.0.0 · API 0.1.0 · 14.0ms