FLT3 (ITD)-W51
Sign in to save this workspaceFLT3 · Variant type: fusion · HGVS: p.L601_K602insREYEYDL · Fusion partner: W51 (ITD)
Drug response on this variant
| # | Drug | Inhibition on variant | Residual | KISS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gilteritinib | 100.0% | 0.0% | 88.97 |
| 2 | Sunitinib | 99.4% | 0.6% | 91.73 |
| 3 | Brigatinib | 99.1% | 0.9% | 82.96 |
| 4 | Ponatinib | 97.8% | 2.2% | 78.23 |
| 5 | Pacritinib | 97.3% | 2.7% | 88.64 |
| 6 | Quizartinib | 96.9% | 3.1% | 99.50 |
| 7 | Fostamatinib | 96.7% | 3.3% | 96.74 |
| 8 | Fedratinib | 96.4% | 3.6% | 96.21 |
| 9 | Selpercatinib | 96.2% | 3.8% | 96.72 |
| 10 | Defactinib | 96.0% | 4.0% | 92.68 |
| 11 | Pralsetinib | 95.9% | 4.1% | 93.43 |
| 12 | Sorafenib | 95.9% | 4.1% | 96.72 |
| 13 | Nintedanib | 93.4% | 6.6% | 90.23 |
| 14 | Entrectinib | 91.4% | 8.6% | 93.69 |
| 15 | Avapritinib | 91.0% | 9.0% | 97.73 |
| 16 | Alectinib | 89.8% | 10.2% | 95.49 |
| 17 | Cabozantinib | 88.0% | 12.1% | 92.73 |
| 18 | Canertinib | 87.4% | 12.6% | 96.49 |
| 19 | Erlotinib | 77.1% | 22.9% | 99.75 |
| 20 | Vandetanib | 72.3% | 27.7% | 95.74 |
| 21 | Rabusertib | 71.4% | 28.6% | 98.74 |
| 22 | Tenalisib | 68.7% | 31.3% | 97.98 |
| 23 | Ibrutinib | 67.0% | 33.0% | 94.74 |
| 24 | Osimertinib | 62.6% | 37.4% | 97.24 |
| 25 | Alpelisib | 61.9% | 38.1% | 97.22 |
Wild-type vs variant — drug response delta
Positive Δ means the drug hits the variant harder than wild-type (mutation-selective); negative Δ means it loses potency (resistance).
| Drug | Variant inh | WT inh | Δ (variant − WT) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gilteritinib | 100.0% | 99.2% | +0.8% |
| Sunitinib | 99.4% | 98.7% | +0.7% |
| Brigatinib | 99.1% | 98.1% | +1.0% |
| Ponatinib | 97.8% | 97.9% | -0.1% |
| Pacritinib | 97.3% | 93.6% | +3.7% |
| Quizartinib | 96.9% | 97.9% | -1.0% |
| Fostamatinib | 96.7% | 97.2% | -0.5% |
| Fedratinib | 96.4% | 98.2% | -1.8% |
| Selpercatinib | 96.2% | 96.1% | +0.0% |
| Defactinib | 96.0% | 94.6% | +1.5% |
| Pralsetinib | 95.9% | 97.6% | -1.7% |
| Sorafenib | 95.9% | 97.3% | -1.4% |
| Nintedanib | 93.4% | 95.2% | -1.8% |
| Entrectinib | 91.4% | 96.1% | -4.7% |
| Avapritinib | 91.0% | 88.6% | +2.4% |
| Alectinib | 89.8% | 84.5% | +5.3% |
| Cabozantinib | 88.0% | 95.0% | -7.1% |
| Canertinib | 87.4% | 86.3% | +1.1% |
| Erlotinib | 77.1% | — | — |
| Vandetanib | 72.3% | — | — |
| Rabusertib | 71.4% | — | — |
| Tenalisib | 68.7% | — | — |
| Ibrutinib | 67.0% | 88.1% | -21.1% |
| Osimertinib | 62.6% | — | — |
| Alpelisib | 61.9% | — | — |
Annotations
Sign in to read and post annotations.
Loading…
Served from saifudeen2026@1.0.0 · API 0.1.0 · 12.5ms